Pancreaticojejunostomy or Pancreaticogastrostomy to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula Formation after Pancreaticoduodenectomy

نویسندگان

  • Maqbool Ahmed
  • Syed Mukarram Hussain
چکیده

Objective: To compare the results of pancreaticogastrostomy (PJ) with pancreaticojejunostomy (PG) in preventing fistula formation after pancreaticoduonectomy (PD). Study design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out in Military and Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi from August 2008 to March 2015 Material and methods: Patients of both gender aged 45-70 years with confirmed or suspected neoplasms of head of pancreas, periampullary or duodenal tumours were included. After pancreatico duodenectomy the pancreatic reconstruction was carried out either by pancreatico jejunostomy (duct to mucosa type, dunken in type) or double layer pancreatico gastrostmy.The fistula rate was recorded after both the procedures using the definition of International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. Results: During this study period, 30 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. In 21 (71.4%) patients pancreaticojejunostomy was done, (18 duct to mucosa type and three dunken type anastomosis) and in 9 (28.5%) patients pancreaticogastrostomy was carried out. Five (20%) patients (3 in duct to mucosa type and two in dunken type) in the pancreaticojejunostomy group developed pancreatic fistula (grade A=2, grade B=2 and grade C=1) and one patient (11.1%) in the pancreaticogastrostomy group developed postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR= 9.9, 95% CI: 1.06-92.7 p= 0.044) Conclusion: In patients undergoing PD for pancreatic head, periampullary or duodenal tumours, PG is more effective than PJ in reducing the frequency of post-operative pancreatic fistula

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Pancreaticogastrostomy - an alternate for dealing with pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy - experience from a tertiary care center of Pakistan.

Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy has been refined over the years to be a safe operation though the morbidity rate still remains high (30-50%). Pancreatic fistula is the most important cause of mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy. To prevent it, surgeons have used two anastomotic techniques: pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy. Recent studies found that pancreaticogastrost...

متن کامل

Reconstruction method after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Idea to prevent serious complications.

Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy represents a critical trigger of potentially life-threatening complications and is also associated with markedly prolonged hospitalization. Many arguments have been proposed for the method to anastomosis the pancreatic stump with the gastrointestinal tract, such as invagination vs. duct-to-mucosa, Billroth I (Imanaga) vs. Billroth II (Whipple and...

متن کامل

Jejunum or Stomach for the Pancreatic Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Yeo, C.J., Cameron, J.L., Maher, M.M., Sauter, P.K., Zahurak, M.L., Talamini, M.A., Lillernoe, K.D. and Pitt, H.A. (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostorny after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery; 222: 580-592. Objective: The authors hypothesized that pancreaticogastrostomy is safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduode...

متن کامل

In search of the best reconstructive technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy.

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is a safer reconstruction than pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), resulting in lower morbidity, including lower pancreatic leak rates and decreased postoperative mortality. We compared PJ and PG after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS A randomized clinical trial was designed. It was stopped with 50% accrual. Patients underwent ei...

متن کامل

[Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of prospective randomised trials].

This is a critical analysis of prospective randomised trials that compare pancreatic reconstruction techniques with the stomach and the intestine, after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A questionnaire with questions from the Evidence Based Medicine Centre of Oxford University (PICO analysis) was used, following the criteria for the evaluation of randomised prospective studies for surgical intervention...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016